Zamknij [x]
Korzystanie z witryny oznacza zgodę na wykorzystanie plików cookie z których niektóre mogą być już zapisane w folderze przeglądarki
Więcej informacji można znaleźć w Polityce prywatności i wykorzystywania plików cookies w serwisie

Uwaga! To jest strona archiwalna UOKiK. Aktualna strona znajduje się pod adresem: uokik.gov.pl

UOKiK - Urząd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów

Powiększ czcionkęPomniejsz czcionkęWersja z wysokim kontrastemWersja tekstowaWersja tekstowaKanał RSSPobierz kod QREnglish version

Tu jesteś: Strona główna > Urząd > Informacje ogólne > Aktualności

False opinions in the network - actions by the President of UOKiK

< poprzedni | następny > 15.06.2022

False opinions in the network - actions by the President of UOKiK
  • "My opinion 5/5", "A company worth recommending", "I recommend wholeheartedly" - sounds familiar? Probably yes, if you read reviews when buying online. Unfortunately, they are not always true.
  • The President of UOKiK charges two companies - Opinie.pro from Lubartów and SN Marketing from Kraków - with trafficking in fake reviews.
  • Creating, soliciting and posting fake reviews online is punishable by a financial penalty of up to 10% of turnover. This is another action of the President of UOKiK on the Internet advertising market this year.

Our activity is carried out fully anonymously, and care for discretion has been written into the company's policy... The service we offer consists in creating professional, positive reviews... It includes single and complex sentences, written in accordance with the rules of the Polish language - this is how one of the entrepreneurs promoted their "marketing" services online. Our findings so far show that this entrepreneur offered to create fake reviews in bulk without any contact with the product or service being reviewed.

The President of UOKiK has been observing practices of this type of companies for several months, checking the rules of cooperation in the framework of the so-called whisper marketing or the service consisting in "guaranteeing original, reliable reviews". The information and evidence collected made it possible to bring charges of misleading consumers against two companies: Opinie.pro and SN Marketing. In both cases, the practice involves obtaining or creating and posting false reviews of products and services on major websites, such as Google, Google Maps, Facebook or Tripadvisor.

"An entrepreneur's reputation should be based on truthful information and developed within the framework of fair market play. The actions of both companies distort the rules of fair play. False reviews can unfortunately give the wrong impression that they are real comments from people who have used the offer. They can therefore artificially inflate ratings and thus mislead customers into purchasing decisions which they would not have made if they had realised they were made up and bought. Such actions may distort the market behaviour of the average consumer", explains Tomasz Chróstny, the President of UOKiK.

The majority of the recipients of services provided by both marketing agencies are entrepreneurs wishing to improve their online visibility and increase sales. Contractors settle up on the basis of issued invoices, without concluding written contracts. Trade in reviews takes place in bundles - 5, 10 or even 200 reviews. Both companies create or obtain reviews, the publication of which is not preceded by the testing of products or services. Initiated proceedings may result in decisions by the President of UOKiK, which can impose penalties for infringement of the collective interests of consumers of up to 10% of of turnover.

The current actions are part of a market analysis initiated last year. The research commissioned by the President of UOKiK shows that almost half of the respondents are afraid of being guided by false reviews when choosing a product. That is why a several months ago UOKiK informed about actions taken against ceneo.pl and opineo.pl. At the time, the President of UOKiK's doubts were aroused by hiding some of the negative reviews and ratings and not taking them into account in the statistics when the seller made contact with the consumer. Both entrepreneurs reacted positively and changed the questioned practices. Currently the Office is also verifying the way reviews are presented by online shops and other platforms, as well as brokers, i.e. companies that acquire or create reviews on request.

When using online reviews, check what to pay attention to:

  1. Reviews from people without profile pictures, from fictional accounts e.g. with photos of models, should make you wary.
  2. Be sceptical if the review you read is part of a sudden increase in comments about a product or service.
  3. Pay attention to the way reviews are written. Be wary of comments giving 5 stars, without a detailed description or very laconic comments e.g. "I can recommend", "great seller".
  4. Ensure that the terms and conditions for posting and moderating reviews are clear and straightforward. In particular, who can provide a rating, whether it applies only to people who have made a purchase.
  5. Avoid sellers who encourage only reviews with a specific content, e.g. positive.
  6. If you are asked to give a review in return for a specific material or financial benefit - indicate that it is a comment after the receipt of an incentive. Also pay attention to whether the shop you are rating marks such reviews in a distinctive way.
  7. If you are asked to give a review on a product you have not used - do not do so, or you will be taken advantage of by a dishonest entrepreneur.
  8. Contact UOKiK if you repeatedly encounter manipulation of real reviews, e.g. by blocking or delaying publication of - usually negative comments - under the pretext of recognition of a problem.

Remember:

  1. Fake reviews are created in the same way as real consumer reviews, but are written upon request, often in bulk. They can be both positive and negative, depending on the objective the brand wants to achieve. 
  2. Fake photos - like reviews - are misleading and their posting may be considered unlawful.
  3. It is illegal for a seller to compile a set of comments and then have them posted online. In practice, it looks like the comments are pretending to be posted by different entities, from different accounts, when in fact they are being prepared by the seller or another entity at the seller's request.

Consumer support:

Phone: 801 440 220 consumer helpline
E-mail: porady@dlakonsumentow.pl
Consumer Advocates – in your city or county
Regional Inspectors of Commercial Inspection

Additional information for the media:

UOKiK Press Office
Pl. Powstańców Warszawy 1, 00-950 Warszawa, Poland
Phone +48 695 902 088, +48 22 55 60 246
E-mail: biuroprasowe@uokik.gov.pl
Twitter: @UOKiKgovPL

Pliki do pobrania

 

Warto przeczytać

PZPN i Ekstraklasa zmieniają praktyki
PZPN i Ekstraklasa zmieniają praktyki

Po interwencji Prezesa UOKiK, PZPN i  Ekstraklasa SA zmieniły swoje praktyki, które mogły stanowić nadużywanie pozycji dominującej.   ...>

Autocentrum AAA Auto - dwie decyzje Prezesa UOKiK
Autocentrum AAA Auto - dwie decyzje Prezesa UOKiK

Prezes UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny wydał dwie decyzje w sprawie AUTOCENTRUM AAA AUTO – łączna kara to ponad 72 mln zł. ...>

Tucz kontraktowy - dwie decyzje zobowiązujące
Tucz kontraktowy - dwie decyzje zobowiązujące

Po interwencji UOKiK poprawi się sytuacja producentów trzody chlewnej w systemie tuczu kontraktowego.   ...>

Nowe decyzje i postępowania Prezesa UOKiK w sprawie zatorów płatniczych
Nowe decyzje i postępowania Prezesa UOKiK w sprawie zatorów płatniczych

Prezes UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny nałożył kary w łącznej kwocie prawie 8 mln zł na spółki Volkswagen Poznań i Solaris Bus & Coach za tworzenie zatorów płatniczych.   ...>

Decyzja Prezesa UOKiK - kara dla CANAL+
Decyzja Prezesa UOKiK - kara dla CANAL+

Prezes UOKiK nałożył ponad 46 mln zł kary na CANAL+ Polska oraz nakazał zwrot środków konsumentom. ...>

Wakacje.pl - decyzja Prezesa UOKiK
Wakacje.pl - decyzja Prezesa UOKiK

Prezentowane na stronie wakacje.pl ceny wielu wycieczek były nieaktualne lub niepełne – inna cena pokazywała się w wyszukiwarce, a inna po rozwinięciu szczegółów oferty.   ...>

 

  
  

Do góry